Using multi
meaning words in poetry seems to be, or has been a universal trait for the
majority of poets…this in itself can be a hindrance, it eliminates a wide
social-economical section of the population, to include several age groups,
young and old alike; it produces obscure images for the reader, ones only the poet
or the well developed eye of the reader can decipher. Thus, the poet has to
decide, who he wants to write for or to, if it is the wider population, he
needs to take into account his readers. I would not read Robert Browning’s
poetry to anyone under eighteen with less than a high school education, and
would prefer they had at lest two years college, and a course in literature,
preferable poetry. Yet I would say anyone could read Emily Dickenson, who is
considered the lesser poet, according to our Higher Educated instructions.
So, my objective is to affect the
majority of people reading my poem (s) within the audience, if I can, then I
feel I’ve done a service. Although
perhaps less praise from the well established Poet’s Journal, Cota, in the United
States and England, it’s a magazine I used to read, years ago, and study their
poetry styles, then figured out ninety-five percent of it was not usable for
me. No discredit to them, it was not my cup of tea. Whenever you confine yourself to a formula, you
limit yourself in a one way or another. It is like taking medicine, it might be
good for you, but they all have side effects.
In poetry you need to find your own voice.
#912 (5-5-2012)
No comments:
Post a Comment